The child’s mother had issued
an application to prevent the child’s baptism going ahead and considered that
the child should be made to wait until she was 16 years old before making such
a decision – the child’s father considered that the child knew her own mind and
that she should be allowed to be baptised now, as was her wish.
Ultimately, whilst there was
no jurisdiction for the Court to order that the baptism take place, it refused
to prevent the baptism happening and the judge felt that the child’s best
interests would be served by starting her baptism classes as soon as possible.
It struck me when looking
through the judgement of this, admittedly, unusual case that despite any
separation, there are an almost incalculable number of decisions that parents
will need to make for children as they grow up. The vast majority of these will
need to be made jointly, both because joint decisions ultimately must be better
for children but also because Parental Responsibility necessitates consultation
when significant decisions are made for a child, such as schooling, religious
upbringing, medical care etc.
Disputes concerning a child’s
religious upbringing are probably less common than say disputes over schooling
but such disputes are not uncommon – even the Cruise v Holmes divorce
settlement included clauses to limit the child’s involvement in the father’s
following of Scientology as his “religion”.
Also sometimes before the
Court are disputes over whether a child should be given certain medical
treatment, for example where one parent is a Jehovah’s Witness and will not
consent to the giving of blood.
It is fairly common for
parents to have differing opinions on various topics but the difficulty with
separated parents is how those differences are communicated, acknowledged,
discussed and dealt with.
Surely better that potential
areas of dispute are considered early on by both parents – at least then they
can identify where they differ in their opinions and where perhaps they will
need some assistance in the future –
court based or otherwise –if those areas become an issue.
The Court devised, some time
ago, a way of encouraging separating parents to think about their views and
opinions in terms of the child’s upbringing early on – Parenting Plans.
These “plans” take the form
of a booklet and include a whole range of different areas relating to the
child’s upbringing – some that parents may not even have given thought to or be
aware that the other holds particularly strong views on.
The idea was that these plans
were given to separating parents at an early stage, either by a Solicitor or
perhaps a Mediator to encourage some forethought and discussion – ideally with
the outcome that neither parent would need to resort to Court applications.
I am not sure how successful
these plans have been or how routinely they are used across the country but I
would say that the earlier potential sources of dispute are identified, the
more opportunity there is for parents to enter into discussions together to try
and resolve matters.
Ok, it won’t be suitable for
every family and life is ever-changing – What if the child expresses a strong
wish for something contrary to what the parents had agreed together? What if
there is a change of circumstances and as a result one or other parent changes
their mind about something?
There is, as ever in cases
concerning children, no one size fits all solution but early identification and
discussion must surely be a positive all round.
No comments:
Post a Comment